OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE
Woking, United Kingdom, Jan 27, 2011
Trio of engineering directors announced ahead of 2011 season
Sometimes, it�s the smallest ripples that have the biggest effect. So a managerial realignment at the top of McLaren Racing won�t result in any radical change, but it�s anticipated that the reshuffle will have numerous long-term benefits. So what�s changed? For starters, Paddy Lowe graduates from his role as McLaren Racing�s engineering director to become McLaren Racing�s technical director.
Paddy will continue to lead our technical strategy in his own quietly authoritative way, but his new role will afford him even greater levels of focus as he will be spearheading new and innovative technical projects relating to our Formula 1 future.
He�ll also continue to represent the technical aspect of Vodafone McLaren Mercedes within FOTA and with the FIA.
Paddy�s broader remit means that Tim Goss, our chief engineer on MP4-25, will assume a larger role within the car development programme. As a result, Tim now becomes McLaren Racing�s director of engineering.
Underpinning them both is Neil Oatley, a McLaren veteran who joined the team in 1986, and continues in his role as director of design and development programmes. Neil will set and execute many of our top-level projects as well as working tirelessly to bring new projects and upgrades to our cars.
�It�s great for Neil and me to be joined by Tim as another director on the technical side,� explains Paddy. �With the three of us, we�ll not only be able to more efficiently spread our workload, but, through Tim & me, we�ll also share race attendance.
�It�s very important to have senior technical management at the racetrack, because that�s where you score the points, but, equally, if you spend all your time away then you risk overlooking some of the hard work that happens back at the factory.�
Tim�s new role demonstrates the huge amount of trust and respect he has earned since joining McLaren Racing back in 1990. It�s also a reflection of the way his role has steadily broadened over the past 12 months.
�I used to be jointly responsible for the direction of our cars with Pat Fry,� explains Tim. �Now I�ve taken on both roles � but there�s obviously been some shifting of responsibilities within the team as, clearly, I can�t do the work of two people.
�As director of engineering, my role will be to co-ordinate a small team of project engineers who are responsible for the specification, design and development of our cars.�
So while the surface ripples may seem minor, it�s the trio�s undercurrent of experience that will be brought to bear. Between them, they share a combined stint at McLaren totalling 62 years, and are cut from the very fabric from which the team is made.
And, despite their quiet humility and unrelenting focus on the future, between them they can lay claim to mightily impressive achievements.
�The first project I did at McLaren was the power-braking system in 1993,� remembers Paddy. �It was really exciting because we only had six races to invent it, deliver it and race it [before it was outlawed at the end of the season]. We developed it over three races, we raced it for three and won two of them � it was worth one second a lap. Very satisfying!
�Brake-steer, too. That was a great project. Steve Nichols came up with the initial idea, but I made it happen within the team, which was very rewarding. One second a lap just for having a very good idea. A great shame it was also later outlawed.
�I was also involved in the very beginnings of our simulator project. We initially didn�t have a great deal of support, some people were initially unconvinced of its benefits, but through Martin Whitmarsh�s support we developed it into a key performance tool.�
Both are also particularly proud of all the diverse systems and processes that were brought together on 2005�s MP4-20 � a race-winning monster that only just missed out on the world championship.
�MP4-20 was a very satisfying car,� says Paddy. �It was the first car with which, as a chief engineer, I felt we all really harnessed our team together. I felt real ownership of what I brought to that car. And it should have won the championship if only we�d made it more reliable because it won 10 grands prix that season!�
Tim adds: �Bringing the first seamless-shift gearbox to Formula 1 was a personal achievement. We�d spent several years working on some very innovative transmission projects � and eventually we settled on bringing a seamless-shift gearbox into Formula 1. And we were working to a particularly tight schedule to not only introduce a new type of technology and new control software, but also make sure it worked in a bulletproof way. Happily, it worked particularly well that season and gave us a big edge over the opposition.�
For Neil, his memories cross generations of the McLaren success story: �The first three McLaren cars I had responsibility for all, were fortunate enough to have won both the drivers� and constructors� championships [in 1989, �90 and �91],� he says. �Which coupled with the unprecedented success of the 1988 made it four doubles in a row for the team.
�Additionally, as we were able to operate as both chief designer and race engineer in those days, winning the drivers� championship with Alain Prost (�89) and Ayrton Senna (�90) was an added hands-on bonus. With Ayrton, too, we won five grands prix in 1993 using an engine that perhaps wasn�t quite able to match the performance of the front-running cars; but we did it with great panache. It was a year of great technical freedom, before the regulations closed in and we were able to capitalise on that to its fullest extent. It was a very competitive year for Formula One racing.
�On a personal note, one of my highlights was to see Mika Hakkinen make a full recovery and come back faster than ever after his terrible accident in Adelaide in 1995. That gave everybody such incredible sense of purpose, and made everything so worthwhile once he was back in the cockpit again.�
"Another favourite memory was taking the year-old 17D car through the entire 2003 season, and keeping it in championship contention right down to the final race. That was a great example of making the best of a limited development resource and making sure all our efforts were transferred directly to the track."
Copyright � 2011, car-evolutioncars. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment